Make up Blogs

Christie Formalism and Neoformalism

When I first read this Christie reading and when we first talked about the history of formalism and neoformalism in class, I was pretty confused. It was hard for me to think about these ideas in relation to Russian cinema. It was only after watching various movies and realizing that we always attain meaning through formal elements of film that I began to realize that this concept was simpler and more accessible than I had previously thought. One of the most important lines in Christie’s essay is that “Formalism, they believe, unlike some structuralist and psychoanalytic methodologies, crucially implies an active spectator…(Christie 62).” Christie further illustrates this point about the active spectator by talking about schemata that organizes our perceptions. These ideas allow us as viewers to watch films and simultaneously look for the elements that influence and guide our understanding. Once we find these elements in one film, it becomes easier to do the same thing with other films.

Einstein

In Einstein’s “The Cinematographic Principle and the Ideogram,” he talks about hieroglyphics as a way to introduce the reader to the idea of montage and how combining certain shots or images creates a new meaning. Einstein says that when we combine two hieroglyphs we read the combination not as their sum but as their product. He claims that “by the combination of two depictables is achieved that representation of something that is undepictable.” He says that this is montage and this is what we do in film. When we apply the film Potemkin to this same idea, we can clearly see that the juxtaposition does create a new concept of meaning, sometimes so instinctively and so seamlessly that we do not even realize that our brain is in fact drawing these connections. This reading was interesting because of the highly scientific and objective basis that Einstein assigns to a seemingly simple idea. He goes on to explain why we understand what we understand when we see what we see on film.

Schrader and Film Noir

Schrader’s work on film Noir starts by giving a brief historical background of the genre. He says that darkness and cynicism had become a major part of American films during the war but that by 1949 movies had become incredibly dark portraying American life in a negative way and in a way that they never had in the past. His article from 1972 discusses the interest in Film Noir at the time because of this renewal of themes of darkness in American films. Schrader cites four catalysts responsible for this genre’s creation and popularity. First, Schrader talks about war and post-war disillusionment, post war realism—which related to disillusionment in that now audiences wanted a more honest look at American life, The German influence, responsible for the “chiaroscuro” or shades of contrast in film noir, and the hard-boiled tradition—a way of thinking and acting that did not sugar coat or romanticize. In looking at Double Indemnity, we can clearly see evidence of Schrader’s point that film noir id not about conflict resolution but a certain mood. In Double Indemnity, we do not get the happy ending or the conflict resolved, but instead are left with a dark and brooding feeling and an almost complete lack of resolution. This film which is stylistically and substantially film noir, presents a cynical view of American life seemingly making the point that there is no way out of misery beside inevitable death.

Psychoanalysis

This excerpt talks about the ways in which psychoanalytic film theory from is expanded upon and changed used in different ways than it was in the past and applied to different, more specific fields. The article discusses the use of Freud’s castration theory and fetishism as it is applied to race relations and colonization. The article also discusses queer writings and theory and the way that psychoanalytic theory is used for “against the grain readings.” Although psychoanalytic film theory of the 1970’s focused somewhat exclusively on the gaze and in Mulvey’s work, on the gaze that men enact upon women, these theories have been rearranged and reconstructed in order to apply to more distinct and selective categories and areas of academic study.